devops-interview-handbook

Architecture Exercise: Design a Highly Available Web Application

Problem Statement

Design a highly available web application that can handle 1 million daily active users with 99.99% uptime. The application should be resilient to failures, scalable, and cost-effective.

Requirements

Functional Requirements

  1. Web Application
    • Serve web pages and API requests
    • Handle user authentication
    • Process transactions
    • Serve static assets (images, CSS, JS)
  2. Data Storage
    • User data (profiles, preferences)
    • Transaction data
    • Session data
    • File uploads (images, documents)
  3. Features
    • User registration and login
    • Real-time notifications
    • Search functionality
    • Analytics and reporting

Non-Functional Requirements

  1. Availability: 99.99% uptime (52.56 minutes downtime/year)
  2. Scalability: Handle traffic spikes (10x normal load)
  3. Performance: <200ms response time (p95)
  4. Durability: Zero data loss
  5. Security: Encrypt data at rest and in transit, compliance (GDPR, PCI DSS if handling payments)
  6. Cost: Optimize for cost-effectiveness
  7. Disaster Recovery: RTO < 1 hour, RPO < 15 minutes

Constraints and Assumptions

Constraints

Assumptions

Reference Architecture

High-Level Architecture

                    Internet
                       |
                  [CloudFront CDN]
                       |
            ┌──────────┴──────────┐
            |                     |
      [Route 53]            [WAF]
            |                     |
    ┌───────┴────────┐            |
    |                |            |
[ALB US-EAST]  [ALB EU-WEST]     |
    |                |            |
    └───────┬────────┘            |
            |                     |
    ┌───────┴────────┐            |
    |                |            |
[Auto Scaling]  [Auto Scaling]   |
    |                |            |
┌───┴───┐      ┌───┴───┐         |
| ECS   |      | ECS   |         |
|Tasks  |      |Tasks  |         |
└───┬───┘      └───┬───┘         |
    |              |              |
    └──────┬───────┘              |
           |                      |
    ┌──────┴──────┐               |
    |             |               |
[ElastiCache]  [RDS Multi-AZ]    |
[Redis]        [PostgreSQL]      |
    |             |               |
    └──────┬──────┘               |
           |                      |
    ┌──────┴──────┐               |
    |             |               |
[S3]          [S3]               |
[US]          [EU]               |

Component Breakdown

1. Content Delivery Network (CDN)

Component: CloudFront (AWS) / Cloud CDN (GCP)

Purpose:

Configuration:

Benefits:

2. DNS and Load Balancing

Component: Route 53 (DNS) + Application Load Balancer (ALB)

Purpose:

Configuration:

High Availability:

3. Web Application Layer

Component: ECS Fargate / EKS (Kubernetes)

Purpose:

Configuration:

High Availability:

Cost Optimization:

4. Caching Layer

Component: ElastiCache (Redis)

Purpose:

Configuration:

High Availability:

5. Database Layer

Component: RDS PostgreSQL (Multi-AZ)

Purpose:

Configuration:

High Availability:

Disaster Recovery:

6. Object Storage

Component: S3 (Simple Storage Service)

Purpose:

Configuration:

High Availability:

7. Monitoring and Logging

Component: CloudWatch, X-Ray, ELK Stack

Purpose:

Configuration:

Alerts:

Discussion Points

Trade-offs

1. Multi-Region vs Single Region

Multi-Region (Chosen):

Single Region:

Decision: Multi-region for 99.99% availability requirement.

2. ECS Fargate vs EKS

ECS Fargate (Chosen):

EKS:

Decision: ECS Fargate for simplicity, but EKS viable for cost optimization.

3. Database: RDS vs Self-Managed

RDS (Chosen):

Self-Managed:

Decision: RDS for reliability and reduced operational burden.

Scalability Considerations

Horizontal Scaling:

Vertical Scaling:

Caching Strategy:

Security Considerations

Network Security:

Data Security:

Application Security:

Compliance:

Cost Optimization

Estimated Monthly Cost (Rough):

Optimization Strategies:

Disaster Recovery Plan

RPO (Recovery Point Objective): < 15 minutes

RTO (Recovery Time Objective): < 1 hour

Recovery Steps:

  1. Detect failure (monitoring alerts)
  2. Route 53 fails over to secondary region
  3. Promote read replica to primary (if DB failure)
  4. Scale up application in secondary region
  5. Verify health checks
  6. Monitor for stability

Alternative Architectures

Serverless Architecture:

Kubernetes on EKS:

Microservices Architecture:

Implementation Phases

Phase 1: MVP (Minimum Viable Product)

Phase 2: High Availability

Phase 3: Multi-Region

Phase 4: Optimization

Key Takeaways

  1. Redundancy: Multiple layers (regions, AZs, instances)
  2. Automation: Auto-scaling, auto-failover, auto-backups
  3. Monitoring: Comprehensive observability
  4. Testing: Regular DR drills, chaos engineering
  5. Documentation: Runbooks, architecture diagrams
  6. Cost-Benefit: Balance cost vs availability requirements

Follow-up Questions

  1. How would you handle database migrations in this architecture?
  2. How do you ensure zero-downtime deployments?
  3. How would you scale this to 10 million users?
  4. How do you handle compliance requirements (GDPR, PCI DSS)?
  5. What’s your strategy for cost optimization?